Template Dataset: category_tiles

Clotting Factor (CF) designation allows for a minimum rebate percentage of 17.1 percent of Average Manufacturer Price (AMP) for single source and innovator multiple source drugs.

This table presents the rate of neonatal abstinence syndrome per 1,000 newborns whose deliveries were covered by Medicaid or CHIP, 2017 - 2019.

Some states have serious data quality issues, making the data unusable for identifying this population. Data for a state are considered unusable based on DQ Atlas thresholds for the following topics: Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment, Claims Volume - IP, Claims Volume - OT, Claims Volume - IP, Diagnosis Code - IP, Diagnosis Code - OT, Procedure Codes - OT Professional. Data from Maryland, Tennessee, and Utah are omitted for the tables due to data quality concerns. Values for Maryland were excluded due to unusuable diagnosis codes in the IP file and the OT file in 2017. Tennessee was excluded due to unusable diagnosis codes in the IP file in 2017 - 2019. Utah was excluded due to unusable procedure codes on OT professional claims in 2017 - 2019. In addition, states with a high data quality concern on one or more measures are noted in the table with an asterisk (*).

Please refer to the DQ Atlas for more information about data quality assessment methods.

This table presents the number of pregnant and postpartum Medicaid and CHIP beneficiaries, 2017-2021. It includes (1) the number and percentage of beneficiaries ever pregnant in the year; (2) the number and percentage of live births in the year; (3) the number and percentage of miscarriages, stillbirths, or terminations in the year; and (4) the number and percentage of births with an unknown delivery outcome in the year.

These metrics are based on data in the T-MSIS Analytic Files (TAF). Some states have serious data quality issues, making the data unusable for identifying this population. Data for a state are considered unusable based on DQ Atlas thresholds for the following topics: Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment, Claims Volume - IP, Claims Volume - OT, Claims Volume - IP, Diagnosis Code - IP, Diagnosis Code - OT, Procedure Codes - OT Professional. Cells with a value of “DQ” indicate that data were suppressed due to unusable data.

Data from Maryland, Tennessee, and Utah are omitted from the tables due to data quality concerns. Maryland was excluded in 2017 due to unusable diagnosis codes in the IP file and the OT file. Tennessee was excluded due to unusable diagnosis codes in the IP file in 2017 - 2019. Utah was excluded due to unusable procedure codes on OT professional claims in 2017 - 2020. In addition, states with a high data quality concern on one or more measures are noted in the table in the "Data Quality" column. Please refer to the DQ Atlas at http://medicaid.gov/dq-atlas for more information about data quality assessment methods.

Some cells have a value of “DS”. This indicates that data were suppressed for confidentiality reasons because the group included fewer than 11 beneficiaries.

This table presents the number of beneficiaries with NAS and the rate of neonatal abstinence syndrome per 1,000 newborns whose deliveries were covered by Medicaid or CHIP, 2017 - 2021.

These metrics are based on data in the T-MSIS Analytic Files (TAF). Some states have serious data quality issues, making the data unusable for identifying this population. Data for a state are considered unusable based on DQ Atlas thresholds for the following topics: Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment, Claims Volume - IP, Claims Volume - OT, Claims Volume - IP, Diagnosis Code - IP, Diagnosis Code - OT, Procedure Codes - OT Professional. Cells with a value of “DQ” indicate that data were suppressed due to unusable data.

Data from Maryland, Tennessee, and Utah are omitted due to data quality concerns. Maryland was excluded in 2017 due to unusable diagnosis codes in the IP file and the OT file. Tennessee was excluded due to unusable diagnosis codes in the IP file in 2017 - 2019. Utah was excluded due to unusable procedure codes on OT professional claims in 2017 - 2020. In addition, states with a high data quality concern on one or more measures are noted in the table in the "Data Quality" column. Please refer to the DQ Atlas at http://medicaid.gov/dq-atlas for more information about data quality assessment methods.

Some cells have a value of “DS”. This indicates that data were suppressed for confidentiality reasons because the group included fewer than 11 beneficiaries.

This blog post was posted on May 6, 2016.

Notes:
1. CAA 2023 provides a temporary 5.0 percentage point FMAP increase to each qualifying state and territory's FMAP under section 1905(b) of the Act, beginning April 1, 2023 through June 30, 2023.
2. CAA 2023 provides a temporary 2.5 percentage point FMAP increase to each qualifying state and territory's FMAP under section 1905(b) of the Act, beginning July 1, 2023 through September 30, 2023.
3. CAA 2023 provides a temporary 1.5 percentage point FMAP increase to each qualifying state and territory's FMAP under section 1905(b) of the Act, beginning October 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023.
4. States that have reported “0” either have no expenditures for that reporting category or have not yet reported expenditures for that category.
5. This report is a cumulative summary report that includes current and prior period adjustment expenditures that apply to this quarter and does not include Collections or Overpayment Recoveries.

This table presents the number of beneficiaries with a delivery, the number of beneficiaries with any SMM condition, and the rate of SMM conditions per 10,000 deliveries, 2017 - 2021.

These metrics are based on data in the T-MSIS Analytic Files (TAF). Some states have serious data quality issues, making the data unusable for identifying this population. Data for a state are considered unusable based on DQ Atlas thresholds for the following topics: Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment, Claims Volume - IP, Claims Volume - OT, Claims Volume - IP, Diagnosis Code - IP, Diagnosis Code - OT, Procedure Codes - OT Professional. Cells with a value of “DQ” indicate that data were suppressed due to unusable data.

Data from Maryland, Tennessee, and Utah are omitted from the tables due to data quality concerns. Maryland was excluded in 2017 due to unusable diagnosis codes in the IP file and the OT file. Tennessee was excluded due to unusable diagnosis codes in the IP file in 2017 - 2019. Utah was excluded due to unusable procedure codes on OT professional claims in 2017 - 2020. In addition, states with a high data quality concern on one or more measures are noted in the table in the "Data Quality" column. Please refer to the DQ Atlas at http://medicaid.gov/dq-atlas for more information about data quality assessment methods.

Some cells have a value of “DS”. This indicates that data were suppressed for confidentiality reasons because the group included fewer than 11 beneficiaries.

This table presents three populations of beneficiaries who could benefit from different levels of integrated care, 2017-2021: (1) beneficiaries who received services for a behavioral health (BH) condition; (2) beneficiaries who received services for a behavioral health condition who also received services for at least one of a number of select physical health (PH) conditions (a subset of population 1); and (3) beneficiaries prescribed medications for substance use disorders who do not have a medical claim for a behavioral health condition (a subset of population 1).

Some states have serious data quality issues, making the data unusable for identifying this population. To assess data quality, analysts used measures featured in the DQ Atlas. Data for a state are considered unusable based on DQ Atlas thresholds for the following topics: Total Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment, Claims Volume - IP, Claims Volume - OT, Claims Volume - IP, Diagnosis Code - IP, Diagnosis Code - OT, Procedure Codes - OT Professional, Gender, Age, Zip code, Race and ethnicity, Eligibility group code, Enrollment in CMC Plans.

Data from Maryland, Tennessee, and Utah are omitted for the tables due to data quality concerns. Maryland was excluded in 2017 due to unusable diagnosis codes in the IP file and the OT file. Tennessee was excluded due to unusable diagnosis codes in the IP file in 2017 - 2019. Utah was excluded due to unusable procedure codes on OT professional claims in 2017 - 2020. In addition, states with a high data quality concern on one or more measures are noted in the table in the "Data Quality" column. Please refer to the DQ Atlas at http://medicaid.gov/dq-atlas for more information about data quality assessment methods.

The Share of Medicaid Enrollees in any Managed Care and in Comprehensive Managed CaAre profiles state-level enrollment statistics (numbers and percentages) of total Medicaid enrollees in any type of managed care as well as those enrolled specifically in comprehensive managed care programs. The report provides managed care enrollment by state with all 50 states, the District of Columbia and the US territories are represented in these data.